On 03/02/2018 06:15 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> A lot of the above comes from my understanding of what connman is
> to do: if it sees the state as Attached and has no Active contexts then
> it starts trying to activate the first context. Ideally, it would never
> see an inactive context for LTE, at least not in the Attached state.
> However, I may be missing something in my understanding of how this is
> intended to work, so any clarification would be appreciated.
Or it should give up if it sees the InProgress error, but yes it might
be that re-ordering messages is the right approach. Daniel, Marcel?
I must admit, I am slightly confused. So we have a different behavior
pattern between UMTS/GSM and LTE networks which expresses itself in the
non ordering of Active and Attached?
Anyway, I don't have anything against ordering the events. Shouldn't be
to hard to update the plugin.