12:09 p.m.
Hi,
With reference to this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/connman/2018-August/022915.html> and this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/iwd/2018-August/004751.html> are there any updates
or further progress to achieve scanning networks with ConnMan + IWD?
Thanks.
6:25 a.m.
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:09:26AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
Hi,
With reference to this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/connman/2018-August/022915.html> and this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/iwd/2018-August/004751.html> are there any updates
or further progress to achieve scanning networks with ConnMan + IWD?
Sorry for the late response. Anyway, I haven't done anyting at this
front. But I planed to start working on this in the coming weeks. The
summer comes to end so there is more time for evening hackings :)
Thanks,
Daniel
3:16 p.m.
24.09.2019, 00:25, "Daniel Wagner" <wagi(a)monom.org>:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:09:26AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With reference to this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/connman/2018-August/022915.html> and this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/iwd/2018-August/004751.html> are there any updates
or further progress to achieve scanning networks with ConnMan + IWD?
Sorry for the late response. Anyway, I haven't done anyting at this
front. But I planed to start working on this in the coming weeks. The
summer comes to end so there is more time for evening hackings :)
Thanks,
Daniel
Thanks Daniel, that would be great, Then, we can finally dump wpa_supplicant.
Keep us posted.
Any help in testing, etc., reach out.
11:15 a.m.
Hi Daniel,
Any updates or progress on this issue?
Getting more and more connection issues (frequent disconnections due to " wlp5s0:
disassociated from xx:xx:11:dc:xx:xxf (Reason: 2=PREV_AUTH_NOT_VALID)" according to
dmsg and I think switching to IWD might help.
(I think this issue possibly due to kernel udpates though.)
Any progress in making connman with IWD able to scan wifi would be great.
24.09.2019, 00:25, "Daniel Wagner" <wagi(a)monom.org>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 06:09:26AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> With reference to this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/connman/2018-August/022915.html> and this
<https://lists.01.org/pipermail/iwd/2018-August/004751.html> are there any updates
or further progress to achieve scanning networks with ConnMan + IWD?
>
> Sorry for the late response. Anyway, I haven't done anyting at this
> front. But I planed to start working on this in the coming weeks. The
> summer comes to end so there is more time for evening hackings :)
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
10:45 a.m.
Hi,
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 05:50:28AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
Any luck with getting connman with IWD to detect wifi using
connmanctl 'scan
wifi'?
Unfortunately, I don't have your original mail anymore and the mail
archive is also not working.
Anyway, a quick test works for me:
connmanctl> scan wifi
Scan completed for wifi
and I also see the corresponding D-Bus messages
method call time=1620901993.323110 sender=:1.63 -> destination=net.connman serial=83
path=/net/connman/technology/wifi; interface=net.connman.Technology; member=Scan
method call time=1620901993.323322 sender=:1.120 -> destination=net.connman.iwd
serial=3637 path=/net/connman/iwd/0/6; interface=net.connman.iwd.Station; member=Scan
method return time=1620901993.323515 sender=:1.106 -> destination=:1.120 serial=1860
reply_serial=3637
signal time=1620901993.323588 sender=:1.106 -> destination=(null destination)
serial=1861 path=/net/connman/iwd/0/6; interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties;
member=PropertiesChanged
string "net.connman.iwd.Station"
array [
dict entry(
string "Scanning"
variant boolean true
)
]
array [
]
[...]
What's the problem with 'connmanctl scan wifi'?
Thanks,
Daniel
8:26 a.m.
Hi Stef204,
As Daniel said, it shall work fine with connmanctl.
Anyway, a quick test works for me:
>connmanctl> scan wifi
Scan completed for wifi
[...]
and I also see the corresponding D-Bus messages
[...]
What's the problem with 'connmanctl scan wifi'?
Maybe you can try
another method to perform the scan and retrieve the service list,
via the dbus interface. By inline commands, you can use dbus-send:
dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=net.connman /net/connman/technology/wifi
net.connman.Technology.Scan
dbus-send --system --print-reply --dest=net.connman / net.connman.Manager.GetServices
or gdbus call:
gdbus call --system -d net.connman -o /net/connman/technology/wifi -m
net.connman.Technology.Scan
gdbus call --system -d net.connman -o / -m net.connman.Manager.GetServices
Hoping it will help to clarify the situation,
Emmanuel
245
days inactive
869
days old
7 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Daniel Wagner -
stef204 -
VAUTRIN Emmanuel (Canal Plus Prestataire)