Hi Vasiu, On 02/26/2018 03:18 PM, Vasiu Alexandru wrote: Obviously, having two default routes doesn't really make sense. Basically, a default route means if any other routing rule doesn't match take the default route. Though the kernel has some ways to differentiate between two routing matching routing entries. There some metrics which are used to decided which route it is to be used per frame. See [1] for more information on this topic. Although it is possible to have two default routes, it is rather confusing and not intuitive from an user perspective. ConnMan clears the routing table on startup. So any left overs from a previous setup or ConnMan crash is removed first. Maybe you see a left over in the two default route scenario. I would say there should only be one default route. In case you have several different networks on the same computer (one or more interfaces) you should have a routing entry per network. For example I have connected via Ethernet and WiFi to my home network: ✗ ip r default via 192.168.154.1 dev wlp2s0b1 192.168.154.0/24 dev wlp2s0b1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.154.54 192.168.154.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.154.61 192.168.154.1 dev eth0 scope link 192.168.154.1 dev wlp2s0b1 scope link So I have one default route which is over the WiFi interface and I have a routing entry for each network per device. Thanks, Daniel [1] http://linux-ip.net/html/routing-selection.html