On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:06 PM Denis Kenzior <denkenz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So while theoretically possible to overflow, this is _highly_
I think we are looking at 35-36 bits of sec info, which is 1-2 thousand
years in the future.
That's a good point.
I guess I'm ok if we try and deal with overflow just in case
setting some really large mtime values as long as l_timespec_to_usecs
isn't overly expensive.
As you point out that the overflows are highly unlikely to occur, I'm
fine with dropping my patches.