Am 01.05.2015 21:37, schrieb Julia Lawall:
Kfree can cope with a null argument, so drop null tests.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression ptr; @@
- if (ptr != NULL)
kfree(ptr);
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall(a)lip6.fr>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
index 604e511..989cdcd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/sec_plain.c
@@ -384,8 +384,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_cli_ctx *plain_sec_install_ctx(struct plain_sec
*plsec)
if (ctx) {
atomic_inc(&ctx->cc_refcount);
- if (ctx_new)
- kfree(ctx_new);
+ kfree(ctx_new);
} else if (ctx_new) {
ctx = ctx_new;
The error handling here is not obvious
the
OBD_ALLOC_PTR(ctx_new);
should have something like
if (!ctx_new)
return NULL;
just my 2 cents
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html