On May 22, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> I wonder what is more clear about that in your opinion
ve
>>> lustre_error/lustre_debug?
>>
>> The fact that you have to explain this shows that it's
>> at least misleading unless you completely understand the
>> code.
>
> Or you know, you might take the function name at the face value
> and assume that CERROR means it's an error and CDEBUG means it's a debug
message?
Maybe, but I think that it'd be better if the mechanism
it uses was more plainly named something like lustre_log.
While the idea seems good, the biggest obstacle here is such that
there's already a thing called lustre log (llog for short too) -
it's kind of a distributed journal of operations.
Its there a different synonym, I wonder?