On May 2, 2015, at 5:16 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Summarize OBD_CPT_ALLOC_GFP, OBD_CPT_ALLOC, and OBD_CPT_ALLOC_PTR as
a
function, obd_cpt_alloc.
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall(a)lip6.fr>
---
Some questions: Is the name OK? Is the NULL test needed? If not, should
the call to kzalloc_node with the call to cfs_cpt_spread_node just be
inlined into the call sites?
I think we don't need this function at all, we can use kzalloc/kzalloc_node directly
with cfs_cpt_spread_node call in.
What we do need is obd_cpt_alloc_large similar to how we need obd_alloc_large (I know I
still owe you a proper patch with that).
The only differences between the two would then be passing down of the cpt (and it's
use) or not.
Bye,
Oleg