If you checked the code, you would see that it's used in
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c too.
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c:extern struct cfs_wi_sched
*cfs_sched_rehash;
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c: rc, &cfs_sched_rehash);
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c: if (cfs_sched_rehash != NULL) {
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c: cfs_wi_sched_destroy(cfs_sched_rehash);
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/module.c: cfs_sched_rehash = NULL;
On Apr 6, 2015, at 10:02 PM, Nickolaus Woodruff wrote:
This patch fixes the following sparse warning:
CHECK drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c:119:21: warning: symbol
'cfs_sched_rehash' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Nickolaus Woodruff <nickolauswoodruff(a)gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
index a55567e..a4920a2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/libcfs/hash.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ module_param(warn_on_depth, uint, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(warn_on_depth, "warning when hash depth is high.");
#endif
-struct cfs_wi_sched *cfs_sched_rehash;
+static struct cfs_wi_sched *cfs_sched_rehash;
static inline void
cfs_hash_nl_lock(union cfs_hash_lock *lock, int exclusive) {}
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
HPDD-discuss mailing list
HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss