Please note that nobody is obliged to keep track with the latest
maintenance release. If your present release is working for you why move?
On 10/17/13 7:25 AM, "Scott Nolin" <scott.nolin(a)ssec.wisc.edu> wrote:
Just be aware that 2.4 was the planned maintenance release series -
but
that is now being dropped and maintenance release switched to 2.5 when
that comes out.
If I understand correctly this was a change decided on based on a desire
for HSM features available in 2.5.
I believe 2.5 is also not as backwards compatible with as many versions
as 2.4. I get the feeling that 2.4 will be viable for a while yet even
after 2.5 is released, but that's just a guess.
Lustre releases in my opinion are kind of in a strange state right now.
Scott
On 10/16/2013 6:33 PM, Bob Ball wrote:
> We are at 2.1.6. So, this means our next step up should be to 2.4.1, is
> that correct? Yes, I would have preferred to have heard such an
> announcement via this list. I would assume the upgrade path/procedure
> is well documented?
>
> bob
>
> On 10/16/2013 6:23 PM, Jones, Peter A wrote:
>> Hi Ed
>>
>> Yes the major version of the maintenance release stream changed. The
>> roadmap aims to show that and we have presented about this change both
>> before and advance at community events like LUG, LAD etc. I suppose
>> that I
>> could/should have stated that information with the release announcement
>> for 2.4.1. Would that kind of notice be sufficient do you think?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> On 10/16/13 2:44 PM, "Edward Walter" <ewalter(a)cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The link for the current maintenance release points here:
>>>
>>>http://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-maintenance-release
>>>/
>>>
>>> This tree seems to contain Lustre version 2.4.1 (as of 2013/09/12).
>>>Did
>>> the major version for the maintenance stream change? I didn't see any
>>> anouncement to that effect. The Lustre Software Roadmap
>>> (
https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Community+Lustre+Roadmap)
>>>seems
>>> to imply that this will happen at some point.
>>>
>>> Thanks much.
>>>
>>> -Ed Walter
>>> Carnegie Mellon University
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HPDD-discuss mailing list
>>> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>>>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> HPDD-discuss mailing list
>> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPDD-discuss mailing list
> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss