Slightly off-topic: for lustre/Mellanox/MPI shops do your MPI apps
(OpenMPI?) see tangible benefits of fca, hcoll, knem from the MLNX OFED on
a mixture of FDR10 and FDR). These are the some reasons given for the MLNX
OFED stack.
On 7 Oct, 2014 4:39 am, "Simmons, James A." <simmonsja(a)ornl.gov> wrote:
>I see all the questions and ask myself:
>Is the difference between OFED and the infiniband drivers in the CentOS
repos tangible?
It depends. I found for most cases it is not worth the extra effort to use
the OFED/Mellanox stack.
Now if you have FDR Mellanox cards then yes using the Mellanox/OFED 3.12
stack makes a difference.
We did have one cluster that was having problems with the RHEL infiniband
stack and going to the
Mellanox stack helped in that case.
>We had the OFED problems and just switched to the CentOS drivers, since
all the clients are running with the
Debian/kernel.org drivers it didn't
seem to make a big difference anyhow...
>
>>On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Indivar Nair <indivar.nair(a)techterra.in>
wrote:
>>Hi ...,
>>I can see quite a few mails on Lustre and OFED.
>>
>>Are there any known issues with CentOS6.5+Lustre 2.5.3+Mellanox OFED
2.3 combination?
_______________________________________________
HPDD-discuss mailing list
HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss