Thanks Brett,
We are looking at our options, 1 hours of FSCK and this lun is only 2.2% done, something
is unhappy.
Brock Palen
www.umich.edu/~brockp
CAEN Advanced Computing
brockp(a)umich.edu
(734)936-1985
On Jun 17, 2013, at 5:58 PM, "Lee, Brett" <brett.lee(a)intel.com> wrote:
Brock,
You can include an "exclude" to the mount command. Something like:
mount -o exclude=<fsname>-OST00XX -t lustre <dev> <dir>
After mounting you can manually disable that OST as well. The 1.8 ops manual has
directions (section 4.3.13 on the one I have). Something like this on the Lustre clients
and the MDS.
lctl set_param osc.<fsname>-<OST name>-*.active=0
There's other options for handling iffy OST's in that section as well.
--
Brett Lee
Sr. Systems Engineer
Intel High Performance Data Division
> -----Original Message-----
> From: hpdd-discuss-bounces(a)lists.01.org [mailto:hpdd-discuss-
> bounces(a)lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Brock Palen
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 2:15 PM
> To: hpdd-discuss(a)lists.01.org
> Subject: [HPDD-discuss] Bringing up FS missing one OST
>
> We suffered a power problem and one of our lustre 1.8 luns is in bad shape.
> Our service has already been down a while.
>
> Is there any special process for bringing up lustre and not having commands
> hang on the lustre mount with one OST missing?
>
> Brock Palen
>
www.umich.edu/~brockp
> CAEN Advanced Computing
> brockp(a)umich.edu
> (734)936-1985
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPDD-discuss mailing list
> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss