On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:50:34PM -0400, Mike Shuey wrote:
@@ -2758,7 +2763,7 @@ void kiblnd_shutdown(lnet_ni_t *ni)
i = 2;
while (atomic_read(&net->ibn_npeers) != 0) {
i++;
- CDEBUG(((i & (-i)) == i) ? D_WARNING : D_NET, /* 2**n? */
+ CDEBUG(((i & (-i)) == i) ? D_WARNING : D_NET,/* 2**n? */
The original was better. I don't like this patch for the same reasons
that people complained about patch 10. It does too many things as well.
regards,
dan carpenter