On 2014/04/11, 10:41 AM, "steve ayer" <steve.ayer(a)trd2inc.com> wrote:
hi alexey,
i went to the gentoo git url that you provided and pulled the set of
patches. then i did a git clone from whamcloud/lustre-release.git, and
found that git apply --check (i'm just doing a local test) wasn't happy
about
0004 (mgs_handler.c:1513 does not apply);
0005 (osp_dev.c:1238 does not apply);
0006 (lod_dev.c:891 does not apply);
0007 (mdt_handler.c:5900 and mdt_mds.c:541 do not apply);
0008 (mdd_device.c:1584 and ofd_dev.c:2392 do not apply);
0009 (osd_handler.c:6020 does not apply).
when i did some digging into the source, i was able to get around some
of the errors (e.g. whitespace), but i stopped when i saw that the code
had changed fairly significantly from what the patch expected, e.g. in
osp_dev.c osp_mod_init().
Steve,
patches for the upstream kernel or lustre-release do not apply cleanly to
the other. The pathnames are all different, and different patches are
applied to the two versions. They are being maintained in parallel, but
porting patches from one to the other needs some work.
If you want to use lustre-release (master) then you should stick to the
patches in Gerrit.
Cheers, Andreas
fwiw, i'm not using zfs...
thanks,
steve
On 04/11/2014 10:00 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Check link to gentoo repo. There are list of patches and patches
> themself ready for git am
> All patches works fine here
>
> steve ayer писал 11-04-2014 17:30:
>> hi alexey,
>>
>> this is very good news.
>>
>> a question though, please? my attempts to apply these patches to the
>> current lustre-release.git were (mostly) unsuccessful. can you tell
>> me what version these patches apply to?
>>
>> my real question relates to my attempt to untangle the graph of
>> patches stemming from lu-3675 -- support for 3.10 -- which is listed
>> as resolved, but points to a bunch of other issues that either are
>> closed or superceded, and finally all trails lead to lu3319, from
>> which patches appear here. lu3319 is listed as "in progress" and has
>> more than several patch lists, some of which point to other patch
>> lists!
>>
>> can you (or anyone else) help me to clarify what set of patches i need
>> to apply to the current lustre-release codebase in order to support >=
>> 3.10.x?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> steve
>>
>>
>> On 04/09/2014 01:18 AM, Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> I'd like to share small status update on lustre running on mainline
>>> kernels
>>>
>>> We get server and client part running on 3.13 unpatches kernel.
>>> Server side
>>> uses zfs as backstore.
>>>
>>> Gerrit change ids
>>>
>>> Ib158ec4444ed7abc0f3c3e820ee4a333631a58d1
>>> I121755b611296bf7b9527de65d0e6cf8c4980151
>>> I6dc7e65c3e74e7934a17939815ec3c334fac58c7
>>> I1a12dd9b1fc8f139116a8f3a684956a5ba88f055
>>> Id8f77d72fd35755f1b7b1c17fcf27e0731bd5ac1
>>> Iaa0f617fcd430e91f12afbc0faf6906fd275a7a5
>>> Icbafdcd2c2fe3959a51dda3f9c715b0ff8d95742
>>> I61b7df6bfd5efd0f12e3ca1a1813b7b62d493168
>>> Ia296a4682e2feda02bcfbe0100de8a89404cd731
>>> Idbd7cd3b7488202e5e8f6fdf757ae6d20e28d642
>>>
>>> Gentoo packages available here
>>>
>>>
>>>http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/sci.git;a=tree;f=sys-clus
>>>ter/lustre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> HPDD-discuss mailing list
>>> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>>>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
HPDD-discuss mailing list
HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division