. When you make a
page worth pointing to from the sidebar, drop me a note and I can add it.
Chris
On 08/14/2014 09:37 AM, Cory Spitz wrote:
Oops, I meant to copy lwg(a)lists.opensfs.org (not
lustre.org).
LWG, see below.
Thanks,
-Cory
On 8/14/14, 11:34 AM, "Cory Spitz" <spitzcor(a)cray.com> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Perhaps there might be a way to collect 'contrib' documents that are not
> core to Lustre with OpenSFS. I suggest that you could make a place at
>
wiki.opensfs.org for them. I think that we can ask the
> lwg(a)lists.lustre.org group about it first (copied).
>
> LWG, can we host 'contrib' docs somewhere on the OpenSFS wiki? Perhaps we
> should create a whole new "Documentation" sidebar to get started?
>
> Thanks,
> -Cory
>
> On 8/14/14, 8:41 AM, "Scott Nolin" <scott.nolin(a)ssec.wisc.edu>
wrote:
>
>> I should also add - many of those documents just don't belong in the
>> lustre manual anyway, such as monitoring JBOD arrays. But nonetheless
>> may be useful for some lustre installations.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On 8/14/2014 8:40 AM, Scott Nolin wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> Much of this information is notes and not in a finished format, so it's
>>> a problem of how much time we have.
>>>
>>> The other issue is contributing to the manual is somewhat cumbersome as
>>> you have to submit patches -
>>>
>>>
https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Making+changes+to+the+Lustre+Man
>>> u
>>> al+source
>>>
>>>
>>> The bar there is a bit higher - we have to be pretty confident the
>>> information that's added is correct, know if it's just for some
>>> versions
>>> of lustre, and so on. As opposed to simply "here are our notes that
>>> work
>>> for us".
>>>
>>> I will try to review what we have and if anything looks really
>>> incorrect
>>> or missing in the lustre manual we will attempt to issue a patch.
>>>
>>> I think in general the lustre manual is correct, but not always
>>> sufficient. I think the process does make sure incorrect stuff doesn't
>>> go in at least, but makes it hard to add information.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On 8/14/2014 6:13 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>>> Hi Scott,
>>>>
>>>> Great job! Would you consider merging with the standard Lustre docs?
>>>>
>>>>
https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Documentation
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HPDD-discuss mailing list
> HPDD-discuss(a)lists.01.org
>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/hpdd-discuss
_______________________________________________
lwg mailing list
lwg(a)lists.opensfs.org
http://lists.opensfs.org/listinfo.cgi/lwg-opensfs.org
.