On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com&gt; wrote: > EREMOVE fails on non-EPC page or when a SECS page with children is to be > removed. These do not happen if the driver is working correctly. Log the > error but do not crash the driver. > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen(a)linux.intel.com&gt; > --- > drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c > index d073057..7f73ac7 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c > @@ -551,10 +551,8 @@ void sgx_free_page(struct sgx_epc_page *entry, > ret = __eremove(epc); > sgx_put_epc_page(epc); > > - if (ret) { > - pr_err("EREMOVE returned %d\n", ret); > - BUG(); > - } > + if (ret) > + sgx_err(encl, "EREMOVE returned %d\n", ret); Do you have something like critical level? For me seems reasonable to increase the level of message if BUG() was somehow related to actual situation.