This tests the previous JSON bug fix removing % sizeof(jsmntok_t)
Objects with more than 10 (sizeof(jsmntok_t)) would not parse
correctly.
---
unit/test-json.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/unit/test-json.c b/unit/test-json.c
index 4c43a8cd..854b92dd 100644
--- a/unit/test-json.c
+++ b/unit/test-json.c
@@ -219,6 +219,35 @@ static void test_json_out_of_order(const void *data)
json_contents_free(c);
}
+/*
+ * Tests that the token bounds checking works.
+ */
+static void test_json_larger_object(const void *data)
+{
+ char json[] = "{\"test1\":\"tester1\","
+ "\"test2\":\"tester2\","
+ "\"test3\":\"tester3\","
+ "\"test4\":\"tester4\","
+ "\"test5\":\"tester5\","
+ "\"test6\":\"tester6\","
+ "\"test7\":\"tester7\","
+ "\"test8\":\"tester8\","
+ "\"test9\":\"tester9\","
+ "\"test10\":\"tester10\","
+ "\"test11\":\"tester11\","
+ "\"test12\":\"tester12\","
+ "\"test13\":\"tester13\"}";
+
+ struct json_iter iter;
+ struct json_contents *c = json_contents_new(json, strlen(json));
+
+ json_iter_init(&iter, c);
+ assert(json_iter_parse(&iter,
+ JSON_MANDATORY("test13", JSON_STRING, NULL),
+ JSON_UNDEFINED));
+ json_contents_free(c);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
l_test_init(&argc, &argv);
@@ -229,6 +258,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
l_test_add("json unsupported types", test_json_unsupported_types, NULL);
l_test_add("json empty objects", test_json_empty_objects, NULL);
l_test_add("json parse out of order", test_json_out_of_order, NULL);
+ l_test_add("json larger object", test_json_larger_object, NULL);
return l_test_run();
}
--
2.31.1
Show replies by date
Hi James,
On 12/10/21 6:21 PM, James Prestwood wrote:
This tests the previous JSON bug fix removing % sizeof(jsmntok_t)
Objects with more than 10 (sizeof(jsmntok_t)) would not parse
correctly.
---
unit/test-json.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
Applied, thanks.
Regards,
-Denis