Le 12/05/2021 à 17:06, Masami Hiramatsu a écrit :
On Wed, 12 May 2021 21:50:57 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2021 11:52:30 +0200
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy(a)csgroup.eu> wrote:
>>
>> Le 12/05/2021 à 11:36, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 20:46, Nathan Chancellor a écrit :
>>>> On 5/11/2021 9:47 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 11/05/2021 à 18:30, kernel test robot a écrit :
>>>>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First bad commit (maybe != root cause):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>>>>> head: 1140ab592e2ebf8153d2b322604031a8868ce7a5
>>>>>> commit: eacf4c0202654adfa94bbb17b5c5c77c0be14af8 powerpc: Enable
OPTPROBES on PPC32
>>>
>>> Ok, the problem appears on PPC32 with that patch, but it must have been there
on PPC64 since the
>>> implementation of optprobes with commit 51c9c0843993 ("powerpc/kprobes:
Implement Optprobes")
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> date: 3 weeks ago
>>>>>> config: powerpc-randconfig-r033-20210511 (attached as .config)
>>>>>> compiler: clang version 13.0.0
(
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
>>>>>> a0fed635fe1701470062495a6ffee1c608f3f1bc)
>>>>>
>>>>> A clang issue ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>>>>> wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
>>>>>> ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>> # install powerpc cross compiling tool for clang build
>>>>>> # apt-get install binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu
>>>>>> #
>>>>>>
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git remote add linus
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>>>>> git fetch --no-tags linus master
>>>>>> git checkout eacf4c0202654adfa94bbb17b5c5c77c0be14af8
>>>>>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>>>>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang
make.cross W=1 ARCH=powerpc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c:34:1: error: unused
function 'is_kprobe_ppc_optinsn_slot'
>>>>>>>> [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>>>>>> DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS(ppc_optinsn);
>>>>>> ^
>>>>>> include/linux/kprobes.h:306:20: note: expanded from macro
'DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS'
>>>>>> static inline bool is_kprobe_##__name##_slot(unsigned long
addr) \
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a 'static inline', shouldn't generate an
'unused function' warning.
>>>> This is a W=1 build, which means that "inline" does not silence
unused function warnings with
>>>> clang because of commit 6863f5643dd7 ("kbuild: allow Clang to find
unused static inline functions
>>>> for W=1 build").
>>>
>>> Ok, I didn't know that.
>>
>> After looking at it in more details, I don't really know what should be done
to avoid that.
>
> Ah, thanks for reporting!
>
>>
>> This unused function is defined as part of DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS(ppc_optinsn).
>>
>> The code uses other items defined by macro DEFINE_INSN_CACHE_OPS, so it cannot be
removed.
>>
>> Solution could be to hide that in a .h, but is that worth it ?
>
> The best solution is to remove ppc_optinsn, but that is defined in kernel/kprobes.c
> just because page allocation is different.
> I think the easiest fix is to add weak alloc_optinsn_page() and override it
> in arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobe.c.
Please try this patch.
Thank you,
Yeah, look pretty similar to the two patches I sent 30 minutes ago.
From 7782fa154349923ed52baa8843cc1d5eed26e82d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat(a)kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 23:33:10 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Define arch specific optinsn memory
allocation
@@ -203,14 +193,14 @@ int arch_prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct
optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
unsigned long nip, size;
int rc, i;
- kprobe_ppc_optinsn_slots.insn_size = MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE;
+ kprobe_optinsn_slots.insn_size = MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE;
Is this still needed ? It looks like it is already done by init_kprobes() in
kernel/kprobes.c
nip = can_optimize(p);
if (!nip)
return -EILSEQ;
/* Allocate instruction slot for detour buffer */
- buff = get_ppc_optinsn_slot();
+ buff = get_optinsn_slot();
if (!buff)
return -ENOMEM;
Christophe