10:23 p.m.
On 10/18/21 7:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I send a patch named ("locking/rwsem: Introduce __rwsem_spin_on_owner()")
> for fixing this.
How about we do something like this instead? That makes the whole
CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER=n side more consistent.
I have no problem， it's more consistent indeed.
Cheers，
Yanfei