On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:19:26AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
commit: 2cefeaf011db4a95ecb515cc2ca61d091a792ac1 [58/85] mm/rmap:
Turn page_mlock() into folio_mlock()
mm/folio-compat.c:169:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'clear_page_mlock'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
169 | void clear_page_mlock(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c:174:6: error: redefinition of 'mlock_vma_page'
174 | void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from mm/folio-compat.c:11:
mm/internal.h:503:20: note: previous definition of 'mlock_vma_page' with type
'void(struct page *)'
503 | static inline void mlock_vma_page(struct page *page) { }
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'mlock_vma_page':
mm/folio-compat.c:176:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'mlock_vma_folio'; did you mean 'mlock_vma_page'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
176 | mlock_vma_folio(page_folio(page));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mlock_vma_page
mm/folio-compat.c: At top level:
mm/folio-compat.c:179:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'page_mlock'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
179 | void page_mlock(struct page *page)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
mm/folio-compat.c: In function 'page_mlock':
>> mm/folio-compat.c:181:9: error: implicit declaration of function
'folio_mlock'; did you mean 'folio_lock'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
181 | folio_mlock(page_folio(page));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| folio_lock
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
All fixed in an update I pushed about two hours ago ;-)