12:48 a.m.
On 8/12/21 9:01 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
Hi Vineet,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on arc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20210812]
[cannot apply to linux/master linus/master v5.14-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url:https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vineet-Gupta/ARC-mm-updates-...
base:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc.git for-next
config: arc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 10.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wgethttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
#https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/0411d3a95cb73722d026f7b3d9c9d8abab8c0d79
git remote add linux-reviewhttps://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review
Vineet-Gupta/ARC-mm-updates-support-3-4-levels-and-asm-generic-pgalloc/20210813-074023
git checkout 0411d3a95cb73722d026f7b3d9c9d8abab8c0d79
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-10.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arc
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot<lkp(a)intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/arc/include/asm/mmu.h:19,
from include/linux/mm_types.h:19,
from include/linux/buildid.h:5,
from include/linux/module.h:14,
from lib/test_bitops.c:9:
>> arch/arc/include/asm/mmu-arcv2.h:80:1: error: 'inline' is not at
beginning of declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
80 | static void inline mmu_setup_asid(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long asid)
| ^~~~~~
arch/arc/include/asm/mmu-arcv2.h:85:1: error: 'inline' is not at beginning of
declaration [-Werror=old-style-declaration]
85 | static void inline mmu_setup_pgd(struct mm_struct *mm, void *pgd)
| ^~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Strange my gcc11 is not tripping on this snafu. Fixed now.
Thx for the report as always.
-Vineet