On 12/3/19 4:38 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Hi Dan,
I can fetch it by the following steps:
nfs@shao2-debian:~/linux$ git remote add 0day-linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux.git
nfs@shao2-debian:~/linux$ git fetch --no-tags 0day-linux-review
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
remote: Enumerating objects: 25261, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (25261/25261), done.
remote: Total 33246 (delta 25260), reused 25260 (delta 25260),
pack-reused 7985
Receiving objects: 100% (33246/33246), 12.03 MiB | 1.05 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (28148/28148), completed with 6149 local objects.
From
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
* branch
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
-> FETCH_HEAD
* [new branch]
Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
->
0day-linux-review/Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-debugfs_create_single-seq-_data/20191129-173440
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
Hi Kefeng,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20191128]
[cannot apply to v5.4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kefeng-Wang/debugfs-introduce-de...
base: d26b0e226f222c22c3b7e9d16e5b886e7c51057a
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter(a)oracle.com>
New smatch warnings:
fs/debugfs/file.c:1193 debugfs_create_single_data() warn: overwrite may leak
'entry'
Old smatch warnings:
include/linux/compiler.h:247 __write_once_size() warn: potential memory corrupting cast 8
vs 4 bytes
#
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/198a4ea9768d6790a169e8b802e702c20...
git remote add linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git remote update linux-review
git checkout 198a4ea9768d6790a169e8b802e702c208aafbd1
vim +/entry +1193 fs/debugfs/file.c
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1179 struct dentry
*debugfs_create_single_data(const char *name, umode_t mode,
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1180 struct dentry *parent, void
*data,
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1181 int (*read_fn)(struct seq_file
*s,
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1182 void *data))
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1183 {
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1184 struct debugfs_entry *entry;
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1185
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1186 entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry),
GFP_KERNEL);
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1187 if (!entry)
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1188 return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1189
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1190 entry->read = read_fn;
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1191 entry->data = data;
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 1192
198a4ea9768d67 Kefeng Wang 2019-11-29 @1193 entry =
debugfs_set_lowest_bit(entry);
^^^^^^^^
I haven't looked at the surrounding code but how would we free "entry"
when we write over it here?
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave(a)lists.01.org