Hi "Aneesh,
[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test WARNING on arm64/for-next/core]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v5.15-rc6]
[cannot apply to hnaz-mm/master tip/x86/asm next-20211020]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-mempolicy-us...
base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-next/core
config: arm64-randconfig-r033-20211019 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
9660563950aaed54020bfdf0be07e7096a9553e4)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install arm64 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu
#
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/10f30e8157782f17ae682c2bbca95c226...
git remote add linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review
Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-mempolicy-use-policy_node-helper-with-MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY/20211020-172721
git checkout 10f30e8157782f17ae682c2bbca95c226af3612a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 ARCH=arm64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs) \
^
<scratch space>:60:1: note: expanded from here
__arm64_sys_process_madvise
^
kernel/sys_ni.c:291:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended
to be used outside of this translation unit
arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall_wrapper.h:76:13: note: expanded from macro
'COND_SYSCALL'
asmlinkage long __weak __arm64_sys_##name(const struct pt_regs *regs) \
^
Is this clang specific? I am not able to recreate this with gcc 10 cross
compiling.
-aneesh