[kbuild-all] [linux-next:master 8847/10009] net/core/sock.c:3203:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_compat_syscal'; did you mean

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master head: de2e69cfe54a8f2ed4b75f09d3110c514f45d38e commit: 8c918ffbbad49454ed26c53eb1b90bf98bb5e394 [8847/10009] net: remove compat_sock_common_{get,set}sockopt config: x86_64-rhel-8.3 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-14) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): git checkout 8c918ffbbad49454ed26c53eb1b90bf98bb5e394 # save the attached .config to linux build tree make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com&gt; Note: the linux-next/master HEAD de2e69cfe54a8f2ed4b75f09d3110c514f45d38e builds fine. It may have been fixed somewhere. All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): net/core/sock.c: In function 'sock_common_getsockopt': 3203 | if (in_compat_syscal() && sk->sk_prot->compat_getsockopt) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | in_compat_syscall cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +3203 net/core/sock.c 3189 3190 /* 3191 * Get a socket option on an socket. 3192 * 3193 * FIX: POSIX 1003.1g is very ambiguous here. It states that 3194 * asynchronous errors should be reported by getsockopt. We assume 3195 * this means if you specify SO_ERROR (otherwise whats the point of it). 3196 */ 3197 int sock_common_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname, 3198 char __user *optval, int __user *optlen) 3199 { 3200 struct sock *sk = sock->sk; 3201 3202 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT 3204 return sk->sk_prot->compat_getsockopt(sk, level, optname, 3205 optval, optlen); 3206 #endif 3207 return sk->sk_prot->getsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen); 3208 } 3209 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_common_getsockopt); 3210 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org