[kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH] memblock: fix section mismatch warning again

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; Commit 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") marked memblock_bottom_up() and memblock_set_bottom_up() as __init, but they could be referenced from non-init functions like memblock_find_in_range_node() on architectures that enable CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. For such builds kernel test robot reports: All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0x74fea4): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_find_in_range_node() to the function .init.text:memblock_bottom_up() The function memblock_find_in_range_node() references the function __init memblock_bottom_up(). This is often because memblock_find_in_range_node lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of memblock_bottom_up is wrong. Replace __init annotations with __init_memblock annotations so that the appropriate section will be selected depending on CONFIG_ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202103160133.UzhgY0wt-lkp@intel.com Fixes: 34dc2efb39a2 ("memblock: fix section mismatch warning") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.ibm.com&gt; Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com&gt; Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd(a)arndb.de&gt; --- @Andrew, please let me know if you'd prefer this merged via memblock tree. include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h index d13e3cd938b4..5984fff3f175 100644 --- a/include/linux/memblock.h +++ b/include/linux/memblock.h @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static inline void memblock_free_late(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size) /* * Set the allocation direction to bottom-up or top-down. */ -static inline __init void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) +static inline __init_memblock void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) { memblock.bottom_up = enable; } @@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static inline __init void memblock_set_bottom_up(bool enable) * if this is true, that said, memblock will allocate memory * in bottom-up direction. */ -static inline __init bool memblock_bottom_up(void) +static inline __init_memblock bool memblock_bottom_up(void) { return memblock.bottom_up; }