[kbuild-all] Re: [powerpc:next-test 125/127] arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c:392:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pkey_enabled'; did you mean

On 7/17/20 7:29 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next-test > head: 0fbd1eb4df96e1cbd039e0b95fdf62cf65a7faf9 > commit: ed411c66eea2ccf93a634ae661a1f79c2bc63d88 [125/127] powerpc/book3s64/pkeys: Remove is_pkey_enabled() > config: powerpc-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross > git checkout ed411c66eea2ccf93a634ae661a1f79c2bc63d88 > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com&gt; > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c: In function 'pkey_access_permitted': >>> arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c:392:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_pkey_enabled'; did you mean 'arch_pkeys_enabled'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 392 | if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey)) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > | arch_pkeys_enabled > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > vim +392 arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pkeys.c > We removed that upstream in 19ab500edb5d6020010caba48ce3b4ce4182ab63 powerpc/mm/pkeys: Make pkey access check work on execute_only_key next-test need to be rebased?