Hi,
On 10/16/21 20:05, kernel test robot wrote:
tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head: 7c832d2f9b959e3181370c8b0dacaf9efe13fc05
commit: ed229454856e565c5a7d3287cbc63f2cf077b34f [7104/8410] power: supply:
axp288-charger: Optimize register reading method
config: i386-randconfig-c001-20211016 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
8ca4b3ef19fe82d7ad6a6e1515317dcc01b41515)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
#
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commi...
git remote add linux-next
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
git fetch --no-tags linux-next master
git checkout ed229454856e565c5a7d3287cbc63f2cf077b34f
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 7c832d2f9b959e3181370c8b0dacaf9efe13fc05 builds fine.
It may have been fixed somewhere.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c:411:8: error: implicit declaration of
function 'iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access'
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
ret = iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();
^
>> drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c:430:2: error: implicit declaration of
function 'iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access'
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
^
drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c:430:2: note: did you mean
'iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access'?
drivers/power/supply/axp288_charger.c:411:8: note:
'iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access' declared here
ret = iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();
^
2 errors generated.
This is my bad, the Kconfig entry for CONFIG_AXP288_CHARGER now needs a depends on
IOSF_MBI, just like
we needed it for AXP288_FUEL_GAUGE when similar changes were made to that. I should have
caught this
during review.
I'll send a follow-up patch fixing this.
Regards,
Hans