Hi Michael,
Le 30/04/2020 à 16:13, kbuild test robot a écrit :
tree:
https://github.com/linuxppc/linux next-test
head: 7d204d846b04d0a1b4d3712736029fbf2e7a7359
commit: 5bb3b9d986426296507d3ef58d1e5fe4625de01f [48/49] uaccess: Rename
user_access_begin/end() to user_full_access_begin/end()
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce:
git checkout 5bb3b9d986426296507d3ef58d1e5fe4625de01f
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/x86/kernel/signal.c: In function '__setup_frame':
>> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:312:7: error: implicit declaration of function
'user_access_begin'; did you mean 'user_access_end'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (!user_access_begin(frame, sizeof(*frame)))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
user_access_end
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
I see you took the entire series.
The problem is that people added additional uses of user_access_begin()
after I submitted the series.
In the meantime, Linus has suggested to keep the original name of the
function and drop patch 5 (see discussion at
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/42da416106d5c1cf9...)
Christophe