On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:52:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/asm]
> [also build test WARNING on tip/master linus/master tip/x86/core v5.11-rc6
next-20210125]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inlin...
> base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
5c99720b28381bb400d4f546734c34ddaf608761
> config: x86_64-randconfig-r026-20210204 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> #
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe...
> git remote add linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review
Thomas-Gleixner/x86-irq-64-Inline-irq-stack-switching/20210205-091059
> git checkout d91ff58e804175dd59e483c7cf236e1fe66c2187
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.o: warning: objtool:
sysvec_hyperv_reenlightenment()+0x7f: undefined stack state
> --
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool:
sysvec_hyperv_callback()+0x7f: undefined stack state
>>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.o: warning: objtool:
sysvec_hyperv_stimer0()+0x7f: undefined stack state
It would help if you'd actually applied the patches to a tree that had
the required objtool patches as described in 0/n. Or better yet, don't
scrape emails if the 0/n includes a git link which you'll run on anyway.
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the advice, we'll add the check to our cluster,
and sorry for the inconvenience.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen