On 11/26/19 2:11 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:11 AM Rong Chen <rong.a.chen(a)intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Nick,
>> On 11/22/19 3:10 AM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 2:46 PM Atish Patra <Atish.Patra(a)wdc.com>
>>>> On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 22:39 -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>>>> Atish, below is a report from 0day bot from a build with Clang. The
>>>>> warning looks legit, can you please take a look?
>>>> Hi Nick,
>>>> Thanks for the email. This is a work in progress branch. Is there way
>>>> not to trigger kbuild tests on this branch ?
>>> That's a common question that Rong or Philip can answer (I forgot what
>>> the answer has been in the past). Rong/Philip, it may be good to have
>>> a URL/link that I can point people to in the future, since it's a FAQ.
>> We have blacklisted "efi_stub" and "wip_.*" branches for
>> general, branches named as ".*experimental.*" or
>> won't be tested by default. and we have a doc to introduce basic
>> configurations: https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki/Repo-Spec
> Thanks for the link. Looks like it doesn't mention the `wip_`
> convention, and it says `*experiment*` (more specifically). Would you
> mind either adding the note about `wip_` or a new wiki page saying "If
> you don't want 0day bot to find/test your branches, please use the
> following naming conventions when pushing branches: XXX." That way in
> the future when I nag someone, and it was just an experimental branch,
> I can just send them the link to the wiki about the convention, and
> don't have to nag you?
Sorry for the delay, I just got the permission to write a doc in
github, please see
Thanks Rong, this is perfect. I've bookmarked it and will forward that
link when someone asks me about blacklisting branches from 0day bot in