On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 9:23 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:39:14 +0300 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 06:13:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 10:34:17PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Andy,
> > >
> > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on net-next/master]
> > >
> > > url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/ptp_pch-use-mac_...
> > > base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git
b769cf44ed55f4b277b89cf53df6092f0c9082d0
> > > config: nios2-randconfig-r023-20210813 (attached as .config)
> > > compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> > > wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
> > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > #
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/6c1fff5c80fe8f1a12c20bac2d28ebfa5...
> > > git remote add linux-review
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> > > git fetch --no-tags linux-review
Andy-Shevchenko/ptp_pch-use-mac_pton/20210813-203135
> > > git checkout 6c1fff5c80fe8f1a12c20bac2d28ebfa5960bde7
> > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross
ARCH=nios2
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Definitely I have compiled it in my local branch. I'll check what is the
root
> > cause of this.
>
> Kconfig misses PCI dependency. I will send a separate patch, there is nothing
> to do here.
That patch has to be before this one, tho.
Yes, I have sent it as a fix to the net, this series is to the
net-next. Am I missing something in the process here? Because I have
been told a few times that I mustn't collect net and net-next patches
in one series in the usual cases.
There is a static inline
stub for pci_register_driver() etc. if !PCI, but there isn't for
module_pci_driver(), meaning in builds without PCI this driver used
to be harmlessly pointless, now it's breaking build.
Am I missing something?
Adding Bjorn in case he has a preference on adding the dependency vs
stubbing out module_pci_driver().
I went all the same way but I have checked SPI and I²C how they are
doing. It seems the common practice is to use direct dependency.
Nevertheless, the stubs in PCI puzzled me a bit, why do we have them
in the first place?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko