Thanks. Is there a way to also add a file to the tree or a commit message that says "DONOT TEST" or such?  Then no branch renaming is needed. On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:41 PM Rong Chen <rong.a.chen(a)intel.com <mailto:rong.a.chen@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Joel, We have a configuration file to set the properties, the definition is at https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki/Repo-Spec, the branches named as ".experimental." ".*dont-build" won't be tested by default, or you can tell us the blacklist branch rule. Best Regards, Rong Chen On 5/14/20 11:42 PM, joel(a)joelfernandes.org <mailto:joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote: > This is just a test WIP tree. Is there a way for me to mark some trees > as not for kbuild testing? > > Thanks for the testing though! > > > On May 14, 2020 11:08:12 AM EDT, kbuild test robot <lkp(a)intel.com <mailto:lkp@intel.com>> wrote: > >     tree:https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jfern/linux.git rcu/refperf >     head:   df3410c1f7436cf0a91127b2629a33923cc62140 >     commit: e9577008869a8d050252b346823d54ab84af4021 [1/3] test >     config: i386-randconfig-r015-20200514 (attached as .config) >     compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0 >     reproduce: >              git checkout e9577008869a8d050252b346823d54ab84af4021 >              # save the attached .config to linux build tree >              make ARCH=i386 > >     If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate >     Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp(a)intel.com <mailto:lkp@intel.com>> > >     All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<): > >     kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'rcu_pr_kthread': >     kernel/rcu/tree.c:3852:35: warning: unused variable 'spincnt2' [-Wunused-variable] >     unsigned long spincnt, spincnt1, spincnt2, x=0; >     ^~~~~~~~ >     kernel/rcu/tree.c:3852:25: warning: unused variable 'spincnt1' [-Wunused-variable] >     unsigned long spincnt, spincnt1, spincnt2, x=0; >     ^~~~~~~~ >     kernel/rcu/tree.c:3851:7: warning: unused variable 'work' [-Wunused-variable] >     char work, *workp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_pr_has_work); >     ^~~~ >     kernel/rcu/tree.c:3850:16: warning: unused variable 'statusp' [-Wunused-variable] >     unsigned int *statusp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.rcu_pr_kthread_status); >     ^~~~~~~ >     kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'rcu_spawn_pr_kthreads': > >             kernel/rcu/tree.c:3979:8: error: passing argument 4 of >             'proc_create' from incompatible pointer type >             [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] > >     &pr_ops); >     ^ >     In file included from kernel/rcu/tree.c:23:0: >     include/linux/proc_fs.h:79:24: note: expected 'const struct proc_ops *' but argument is of type 'const struct file_operations *' >     struct proc_dir_entry *proc_create(const char *name, umode_t mode, struct proc_dir_entry *parent, const struct proc_ops *proc_ops); >     ^~~~~~~~~~~ >     kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function 'pr_proc_write': > >             kernel/rcu/tree.c:3957:1: warning: control reaches end of >             non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > >     } >     ^ >     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > >     vim +/proc_create +3979 kernel/rcu/tree.c > >        3935 >        3936   ssize_t pr_proc_write(struct file * f, const char __user * b, size_t s, loff_t * off) >        3937   { >        3938           u64 before, after; >        3939 >        3940           WRITE_ONCE(work_type, PERCPU_RWSEM); >        3941   repeat: >        3942           smp_mb(); >        3943 >        3944           before = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); >        3945           do_one_pr_test(); >        3946           after = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); >        3947 >        3948           pr_err("Total time: %lu us , type: %s\n", (unsigned long)((after - before) / 1000), >        3949                                   (work_type == PERCPU_RWSEM ? "percpu-rwsem" : "rwsem") ); >        3950 >        3951           if (work_type != RWSEM) { >        3952                   work_type = RWSEM; >        3953                   msleep(100); >        3954                   goto repeat; >        3955           } >        3956 > >         3957 } > >        3958 >        3959   static const struct file_operations pr_ops = { >        3960           .write = pr_proc_write, >        3961           .llseek = default_llseek, >        3962   }; >        3963 >        3964   /* >        3965    * Spawn boost kthreads -- called as soon as the scheduler is running. >        3966    */ >        3967   static void __init rcu_spawn_pr_kthreads(void) >        3968   { >        3969           int cpu; >        3970 >        3971           for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) >        3972  per_cpu(rcu_data.rcu_pr_has_work, cpu) = 0; >        3973 >        3974           if (WARN_ONCE(smpboot_register_percpu_thread(&rcu_pr_thread_spec), >        3975                                   "%s: Could not start rcub kthread, OOM is now expected behavior\n", __func__)) >        3976                   return; >        3977 >        3978           proc_create("prw_test", 0777, NULL, > >         3979 &pr_ops); > >        3980 >        3981           /* >        3982           for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { >        3983                   pr_err("waking up thread on online cpu %d\n", cpu); >        3984  per_cpu(rcu_data.rcu_pr_has_work, cpu) = 1; >        3985                   smp_mb(); >        3986  wake_up_process(per_cpu(rcu_data.pr_kthread, cpu)); >        3987           } >        3988           */ >        3989   } >        3990 >  ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >     0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.