Dan,
On 6/21/20 10:24 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On 6/21/20 4:12 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Jacek
>>
>> On 6/19/20 5:10 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> On 6/19/20 6:35 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>> Jacek
>>>>
>>>> On 6/18/20 6:26 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>> On 6/19/20 12:09 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 6/18/20 11:44 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>> Jacek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 6/18/20 4:21 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6/18/20 12:33 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Jacek
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 4:41 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 9:22 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Pavel/Jacek
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/17/20 11:28 AM, kernel test robot
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dan,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I love your patch! Yet something to
improve:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [auto build test ERROR on
pavel-linux-leds/for-next]
>>>>>>>>>>>> [cannot apply to
j.anaszewski-leds/for-next]
>>>>>>>>>>>> [if your patch is applied to the wrong
git tree, please
>>>>>>>>>>>> drop us a note to help
>>>>>>>>>>>> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest
to use '--base'
>>>>>>>>>>>> option to specify the
>>>>>>>>>>>> base tree in git format-patch, please see
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> url:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dan-Murphy/Multicolor-Framework-...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> base:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-leds.git
>>>>>>>>>>>> for-next
>>>>>>>>>>>> config: ia64-randconfig-r015-20200617
(attached as .config)
>>>>>>>>>>>> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>>>>>>>>>>> wget
>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
>>>>>>>>>>>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>>>>>>>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>>>>>>>>>> # save the attached .config to
linux build tree
>>>>>>>>>>>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day
>>>>>>>>>>>> COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=ia64
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add
following tag as appropriate
>>>>>>>>>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot
<lkp(a)intel.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> All errors (new ones prefixed by
>>, old ones prefixed by
>>>>>>>>>>>> <<):
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ia64-linux-ld:
drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.o: in
>>>>>>>>>>>> function `lp55xx_set_mc_brightness':
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c:146: undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to
`led_mc_calc_color_components'
>>>>>>>>>>>> ia64-linux-ld:
drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.o: in
>>>>>>>>>>>> function
`devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register':
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
include/linux/led-class-multicolor.h:74: undefined
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reference to
`devm_led_classdev_multicolor_register_ext'
>>>>>>>>>>>> vim +146
drivers/leds/leds-lp55xx-common.c
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 138
>>>>>>>>>>>> 139 static int
lp55xx_set_mc_brightness(struct
>>>>>>>>>>>> led_classdev *cdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 140 enum
led_brightness
>>>>>>>>>>>> brightness)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 141 {
>>>>>>>>>>>> 142 struct led_classdev_mc
*mc_dev =
>>>>>>>>>>>> lcdev_to_mccdev(cdev);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 143 struct lp55xx_led *led =
>>>>>>>>>>>> mcled_cdev_to_led(mc_dev);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 144 struct
lp55xx_device_config *cfg =
>>>>>>>>>>>> led->chip->cfg;
>>>>>>>>>>>> 145
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 146
led_mc_calc_color_components(&led->mc_cdev,
>>>>>>>>>>>> brightness);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 147 return
cfg->multicolor_brightness_fn(led);
>>>>>>>>>>>> 148
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well this was a mess to figure out.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The only fix I can figure out here is to
remove the
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR ||
>>>>>>>>>>> !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> from each child device and add
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> select LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to the LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This way the Multi color framework will
inherit the symbol
>>>>>>>>>>> that was set by the COMMON flag which is
inherited by
>>>>>>>>>>> majority from the child flags.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did you try this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -398,6 +398,7 @@ config LEDS_LP50XX
>>>>>>>>>> config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>>>>> tristate "Common Driver for
TI/National
>>>>>>>>>> LP5521/5523/55231/5562/8501"
>>>>>>>>>> depends on LEDS_LP5521 || LEDS_LP5523 ||
LEDS_LP5562
>>>>>>>>>> || LEDS_LP8501
>>>>>>>>>> + depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR ||
>>>>>>>>>> !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
>>>>>>>>>> depends on OF
>>>>>>>>>> select FW_LOADER
>>>>>>>>>> select FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes I did
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That gave unmet dependencies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for
>>>>>>>>> LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
>>>>>>>>> Depends on [m]: NEW_LEDS [=y] &&
(LEDS_LP5521 [=n] ||
>>>>>>>>> LEDS_LP5523 [=m] || LEDS_LP5562 [=y] || LEDS_LP8501
[=y]) &&
>>>>>>>>> (LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m] ||
!LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m])
>>>>>>>>> && OF [=y]
>>>>>>>>> Selected by [y]:
>>>>>>>>> - LEDS_LP5562 [=y] && NEW_LEDS [=y]
&& LEDS_CLASS [=y] &&
>>>>>>>>> I2C [=y]
>>>>>>>>> - LEDS_LP8501 [=y] && NEW_LEDS [=y]
&& LEDS_CLASS [=y] &&
>>>>>>>>> I2C [=y]
>>>>>>>>> Selected by [m]:
>>>>>>>>> - LEDS_LP5523 [=m] && NEW_LEDS [=y]
&& LEDS_CLASS [=y] &&
>>>>>>>>> I2C [=y] && (LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m] ||
>>>>>>>>> !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR [=m])
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When I was testing that yesterday I also had the same
warning
>>>>>>>> at some
>>>>>>>> point of testing different Kconfig setups, but with what
I
>>>>>>>> showed above
>>>>>>>> it ceased to appear. Now every time I am doing "make
>>>>>>>> oldconfig" the
>>>>>>>> CONFIG_LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON=y entry gets changed to =m with
the
>>>>>>>> config
>>>>>>>> from the test bot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is not what I saw in my testing especially after doing a
>>>>>>> distclean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please give your exact steps after "make
distclean" and
>>>>>> copying test bot config to the kernel root directory?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also, please share the toolchain you're using for tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually at this stage the toolchain is of lesser relevance.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've tried once more and indeed the problem shows up.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is caused by the driver entries doing
>>>>>
>>>>> "select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON".
>>>>>
>>>>> Select sets config to "y" so it conflicts with
>>>>> "depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR ||
!LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR"
>>>>> in the "config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON".
>>>>>
>>>>> Your proposed fix will block the possibility of building
>>>>> LED_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR as a module when LP55XX drivers
>>>>> are enabled so this is also not an option.
>>>>>
>>>>> Solving this riddle will require some more thinking.
>>>>> I haven't analyzed it in detail but maybe "imply"
statement from
>>>>> kconfig-language.rst could help somehow here.
>>>>
>>>> The multicolor framework will build as a module if the LED_CLASS
>>>> is defined as a module.
>>>>
>>>> See attached test_defconfig
>>>
>>> But it will be impossible to enable CONFIG_LEDS_LP50XX without
>>> CONFIG_LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR if you will remove
>>>
>>> depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR.
>>>
>> I was not removing the dependency for the LP50xx only the LP55xx.
>
> It was my typo, I meant LP55XX.
>
>>
>>> This is actually why the above entry was needed.
>>>
>>> LP55XX drivers have to work also without multicolor class.
>>>
>> Well I am not sure how else to resolve this problem. Because the
>> LP55xx has multi level dependencies.
>>
>> Only the LP55xx_common has the dependency on the MC framework. The
>> device drivers do not.
>>
>> The issue is the mixing and matching of the MC fw as a module vs the
>> LP55XX_COMMON as a built-in.
>
> The simplest solution is to avoid selecting LP55XX_COMMON in favor
> of making child drivers depending on it. Of course, maybe there exists
> some trickier option to keep the selection, but I would have to play
> a bit more with it to be sure.
Yep, this seems to be the only viable solution.
My proposed change to the Kconfig:
diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
index adfa762cb291..10de7d237ffd 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
@@ -397,10 +397,10 @@ config LEDS_LP50XX
config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
tristate "Common Driver for TI/National
LP5521/5523/55231/5562/8501"
- depends on LEDS_LP5521 || LEDS_LP5523 || LEDS_LP5562 ||
LEDS_LP8501
depends on OF
select FW_LOADER
select FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER
+ depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
help
This option supports common operations for
LP5521/5523/55231/5562/8501
devices.
@@ -408,8 +408,7 @@ config LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
config LEDS_LP5521
tristate "LED Support for N.S. LP5521 LED driver chip"
depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C
- depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
- select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
+ depends on LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
help
If you say yes here you get support for the National
Semiconductor
LP5521 LED driver. It is 3 channel chip with programmable
engines.
@@ -419,8 +418,7 @@ config LEDS_LP5521
config LEDS_LP5523
tristate "LED Support for TI/National LP5523/55231 LED driver
chip"
depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C
- depends on LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR || !LEDS_CLASS_MULTI_COLOR
- select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
+ depends on LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
help
If you say yes here you get support for TI/National
Semiconductor
LP5523/55231 LED driver.
@@ -431,7 +429,7 @@ config LEDS_LP5523
config LEDS_LP5562
tristate "LED Support for TI LP5562 LED driver chip"
depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C
- select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
+ depends on LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
help
If you say yes here you get support for TI LP5562 LED driver.
It is 4 channels chip with programmable engines.
@@ -441,7 +439,7 @@ config LEDS_LP5562
config LEDS_LP8501
tristate "LED Support for TI LP8501 LED driver chip"
depends on LEDS_CLASS && I2C
- select LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
+ depends on LEDS_LP55XX_COMMON
help
If you say yes here you get support for TI LP8501 LED driver.
It is 9 channel chip with programmable engines.
I made the same exact change and I am testing this now. Need to see how
the u8500_defconfig builds as that is the only defconfig that uses the
LP5521 in tree.
I will need to add the LP55XX_COMMON in that defconfig but verifying the
build works once I do.
Dan