tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git kunit-fixes head: c1610aae495bae98319445d322a875556bbe3cba commit: 8f0877c26e4b695f824c5dbcc4b964ce238328aa [14/24] thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required config: sparc-randconfig-r015-20210622 (attached as .config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git... git remote add kselftest https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git git fetch --no-tags kselftest kunit-fixes git checkout 8f0877c26e4b695f824c5dbcc4b964ce238328aa # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com&gt; All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:9: drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_single_hop_walk': 387 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:900:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 900 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1263:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' 1263 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:387:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 387 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:398:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field 398 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:900:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 900 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1263:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' 1263 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:398:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 398 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_daisy_chain_walk': drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:444:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field 444 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:900:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 900 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1263:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' 1263 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:444:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 444 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:900:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 900 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1263:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' 1263 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_simple_tree_walk': drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:505:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field 505 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:900:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 900 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/kunit/test.h:1263:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION' 1263 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:505:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ' 505 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:516:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field 516 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); | ^ include/kunit/test.h:776:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION' 776 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \ | ^~~~ include/kunit/test.h:890:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION' 890 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/typeof +387 drivers/thunderbolt/test.c 352 353 static void tb_test_path_single_hop_walk(struct kunit *test) 354 { 355 /* 356 * Walks from Host PCIe downstream port to Device #1 PCIe 357 * upstream port. 358 * 359 * [Host] 360 * 1 | 361 * 1 | 362 * [Device] 363 */ 364 static const struct port_expectation test_data[] = { 365 { .route = 0x0, .port = 8, .type = TB_TYPE_PCIE_DOWN }, 366 { .route = 0x0, .port = 1, .type = TB_TYPE_PORT }, 367 { .route = 0x1, .port = 1, .type = TB_TYPE_PORT }, 368 { .route = 0x1, .port = 9, .type = TB_TYPE_PCIE_UP }, 369 }; 370 struct tb_port *src_port, *dst_port, *p; 371 struct tb_switch *host, *dev; 372 int i; 373 374 host = alloc_host(test); 375 dev = alloc_dev_default(test, host, 1, true); 376 377 src_port = &host->ports[8]; 378 dst_port = &dev->ports[9]; 379 380 /* Walk both directions */ 381 382 i = 0; 383 tb_for_each_port_on_path(src_port, dst_port, p) { 384 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); 385 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); 386 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); 388 i++; 389 } 390 391 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); 392 393 i = ARRAY_SIZE(test_data) - 1; 394 tb_for_each_port_on_path(dst_port, src_port, p) { 395 KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data)); 396 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, tb_route(p->sw), test_data[i].route); 397 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->port, test_data[i].port); 398 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type); 399 i--; 400 } 401 402 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); 403 } 404 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org