On 4/10/21 9:26 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:23:06PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 4/9/21 9:23 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Helge,
>>
>> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>>
>> tree:
https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts.git 4.19/android_r
>> head: 072f407465e8e25a3c2c22590e1ab72ccf335151
>> commit: 36960edcc32ce26bcf470e6129c4dc26a44e97ca [20730/22631] UPSTREAM: parisc:
Switch from DISCONTIGMEM to SPARSEMEM
>> config: parisc-randconfig-r035-20210409 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> #
https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts/commit/36960edcc32ce26bcf470e612...
>> git remote add intel-linux-intel-lts
https://github.com/intel/linux-intel-lts.git
>> git fetch --no-tags intel-linux-intel-lts 4.19/android_r
>> git checkout 36960edcc32ce26bcf470e6129c4dc26a44e97ca
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross
ARCH=parisc
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> arch/parisc/mm/init.c: In function 'pagetable_init':
>> arch/parisc/mm/init.c:655:17: warning: variable 'end_paddr' set but
not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> 655 | unsigned long end_paddr;
>> | ^~~~~~~~~
>> arch/parisc/mm/init.c: In function 'paging_init':
>>>> arch/parisc/mm/init.c:734:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'memblocks_present'; did you mean 'memblock_reserve'?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 734 | memblocks_present();
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | memblock_reserve
>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
>
> This patch:
> commit 36960edcc32ce26bcf470e6129c4dc26a44e97ca
> Author: Helge Deller <deller(a)gmx.de>
> UPSTREAM: parisc: Switch from DISCONTIGMEM to SPARSEMEM
>
> was cherry-picked into this 4.19/android_r tree.
> It was only submitted to kernel v5.2 and is not suitable for earlier kernels.
>
> Greg, can you please drop this specific patch again from the
> linux-intel-lts.git/android_r tree to avoid this build error.
What tree is "linux-intel-lts.git/android_r" and why do people think
that I have anything to do with it?
Below is the commit message, which is why I had the impression that you
had merged this patch into this "linux-intel-lts.git/android_r" git tree:
commit 36960edcc32ce26bcf470e6129c4dc26a44e97ca
Author: Helge Deller <deller(a)gmx.de>
Date: Tue Apr 9 21:52:35 2019 +0200
...
Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com>
Fixes: 1c30844d2dfe ("mm: reclaim small amounts of memory when an external
fragmentation event occurs")
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller(a)gmx.de>
(cherry picked from commit dbdf0760990583649bfaca75fd98f76afd5f3905)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)google.com>
Change-Id: Icea3d5728ab2a218c4f6aa14b2c89984bba484dd
I keep asking that the 0-day people stop emailing me about random
vendor-specific branches, but they don't seem to do so :(
Understood.
lkp: Who owns the linux-intel-lts git tree, and why isn't the owner
in Cc from the beginning?
Helge