[drm-drm-intel:drm-intel-gt-next 7/8] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c:181:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'intel_region_ttm_node_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
5:01 p.m.
tree: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next
head: 13c2ceb6addb6b14468e09b75832c98909eed8e7
commit: d53ec322dc7de32a59bf1c2a56b93e90fc2f1c28 [7/8] drm/i915/ttm: switch over to
ttm_buddy_man
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-kselftests (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
# sparse version: v0.6.3-341-g8af24329-dirty
git remote add drm-drm-intel git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel
git fetch --no-tags drm-drm-intel drm-intel-gt-next
git checkout d53ec322dc7de32a59bf1c2a56b93e90fc2f1c28
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' W=1 ARCH=x86_64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c:181:6: sparse: sparse:
symbol 'intel_region_ttm_node_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
5:01 p.m.
New subject: [RFC PATCH drm-drm-intel] drm/i915/ttm: intel_region_ttm_node_free() can be static
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c:181:6: warning: symbol
'intel_region_ttm_node_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fixes: d53ec322dc7d ("drm/i915/ttm: switch over to ttm_buddy_man")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
---
intel_region_ttm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c
index 052253c81e984..01e3062e6948b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_region_ttm.c
@@ -178,8 +178,8 @@ intel_region_ttm_resource_alloc(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
#endif
-void intel_region_ttm_node_free(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
- struct ttm_resource *res)
+static void intel_region_ttm_node_free(struct intel_memory_region *mem,
+ struct ttm_resource *res)
{
struct ttm_resource_manager *man = mem->region_private;
460
days inactive
460
days old
1 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
kernel test robot