Hi Douglas,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on pinctrl/devel]
[also build test WARNING on v5.8-rc4 next-20200708]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Douglas-Anderson/pinctrl-qcom-Ha...
base:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git devel
config: arm-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O
~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c:914:6: warning: no previous
prototype for 'msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
914 | void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq +914 drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
913
914 void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
915 {
916 struct irq_data *d = &desc->irq_data;
917
918 /* Make sure we're primed for the next edge */
919 msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent(d);
920
921 /* Pass on to the normal interrupt handler */
922 handle_fasteoi_irq(desc);
923 }
924
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org