Hi Wei Yang,
On 04/26/18 at 09:18am, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:18:46AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> >The struct resource uses singly linked list to link siblings. It's not
> >easy to do reverse iteration on sibling list. So replace it with list_head.
> >
>
> Hi, Baoquan
>
> Besides changing the data structure, I have another proposal to do the reverse
> iteration. Which means it would not affect other users, if you just want a
> reverse iteration.
>
> BTW, I don't think Andrew suggest to use linked-list directly. What he wants
> is a better solution to your first proposal in
>
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10300819/.
>
> Below is my proposal of resource reverse iteration without changing current
> design.
I got your mail and read it, then interrupted by other thing and forgot
replying, sorry.
I am fine with your code change. As I said before, I have tried to change
code per reviewers' comment, then let reviewers decide which way is
better. Please feel free to post formal patches and joining discussion
about this issue.
Yep, while I don't have a real requirement to add the reverse version, so what
is the proper way to send a patch?
A patch reply to this thread is ok?