On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:16:38AM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:36:50AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 05:13:59PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > Currently only the blocksize is checked, but we should really be calling
> > bdev_dax_supported() which also tests to make sure we can get a
> > struct dax_device and that the dax_direct_access() path is working.
> >
> > This is the same check that we do for the "-o dax" mount option in
> > xfs_fs_fill_super().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler(a)linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de>
>
> I think we just want to pick this up ASAP. And between my vague
> memoried and that reviewed-by tag it already was part of a different
> series, wasn't it?
Yep, the first 2 patches were part of this series:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/7/552
which you reviewed. I included them in this series because the later patches
needed to build on them. It looks like they are now in Darrick's
xfs-4.14-fixes branch, but haven't yet made it upstream.
I'm pulling that first patch from -fixes because Dave & Christoph
started discussing it again in this new thread after I'd pushed the
patch from September 7th to korg.
The second patch looks fine, it'll stay.
--D
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html