On 01/09/18 02:28 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 01:11:18PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I think this belongs in the caller - both the validity check, and
> passing in NOMERGE for this type of request. I don't want to impose
> this overhead on everything, for a pretty niche case.
It is just a single branch, which will be predicted as not taken
for non-P2P users. The benefit is that we get proper error checking
by doing it in the block code.
I personally agree with Christoph. But if there's consensus in the other
direction or this is a real blocker moving this forward, I can remove it
for the next version.
Logan