On 03/30/2017 01:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Linda Knippers
> On 3/30/2017 12:56 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Patches welcome :).
> You won't like my patch for that because I agree with Jeff. :-)
> Right now I'm more interested in seeing if I can modify the tests to not
> require nfit_test. I've only looked at btt-check.sh but so far, it doesn't
> look that hard.
The point of nfit_test is that you can run them with worrying about
risks to real data. So I don't want to see patches moving existing
nfit_test tests to something else.
I'd like to test on an unmodified kernel using real hardware with a real nfit.
As long as it's clear that the test needs a scratch device, why is that bad?
Maybe other tests are more difficult but the btt-check test looks pretty