On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 09:07:21AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
+enum dax_wake_mode {
+ WAKE_NEXT,
+ WAKE_ALL,
+};
Why define them in this order when ...
@@ -196,7 +207,7 @@ static void dax_wake_entry(struct xa_state *xas,
void *entry, bool wake_all)
* must be in the waitqueue and the following check will see them.
*/
if (waitqueue_active(wq))
- __wake_up(wq, TASK_NORMAL, wake_all ? 0 : 1, &key);
+ __wake_up(wq, TASK_NORMAL, mode == WAKE_ALL ? 0 : 1, &key);
... they're used like this? This is almost as bad as
enum bool {
true,
false,
};