12:04 p.m.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:09 PM Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com> wrote:
A misbehaving qemu created a situation where the ACPI SRAT table
advertised one fewer proximity domains than intended. The NFIT table did
describe all the expected proximity domains. This caused the device dax
driver to assign an impossible target_node to the device, and when
hotplugged as system memory, this would fail with the following
signature:
[ +0.001627] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088
[ +0.001331] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ +0.000975] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ +0.000976] PGD 80000001767d4067 P4D 80000001767d4067 PUD 10e0c4067 PMD 0
[ +0.001338] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
[ +0.000676] CPU: 4 PID: 22737 Comm: kswapd3 Tainted: G O 5.6.0-rc5 #9
[ +0.001457] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ +0.001990] RIP: 0010:prepare_kswapd_sleep+0x7c/0xc0
[ +0.000780] Code: 89 df e8 87 fd ff ff 89 c2 31 c0 84 d2 74 e6 0f 1f 44
00 00 48 8b 05 fb af 7a 01 48 63 93 88 1d 01 00 48 8b
84 d0 20 0f 00 00 <48> 3b 98 88 00 00 00 75 28 f0 80 a0
80 00 00 00 fe f0 80 a3 38 20
[ +0.002877] RSP: 0018:ffffc900017a3e78 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ +0.000805] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881209e0000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ +0.001115] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881209e0e80
[ +0.001098] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000008000
[ +0.001092] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: 0000000000000003
[ +0.001092] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffc900017a3ec8
[ +0.001091] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888318c00000(0000)
knlGS:0000000000000000
[ +0.001275] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ +0.000882] CR2: 0000000000000088 CR3: 0000000120b50002 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[ +0.001095] Call Trace:
[ +0.000388] kswapd+0x103/0x520
[ +0.000494] ? finish_wait+0x80/0x80
[ +0.000547] ? balance_pgdat+0x5a0/0x5a0
[ +0.000607] kthread+0x120/0x140
[ +0.000508] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[ +0.000706] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
Add a check in the kmem driver to ensure that the target_node for the
device in question is in the nodes_possible mask.
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma(a)intel.com>
---
drivers/dax/kmem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
index 3d0a7e702c94..760c5b4e88c8 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct device *dev)
* unavoidable performance issues.
*/
numa_node = dev_dax->target_node;
- if (numa_node < 0) {
+ if (numa_node < 0 || !node_possible(numa_node)) {
Looks good.
Additionally, I think we should also fix this at the other end and
have the nfit driver validate that the proximity domain values that it
translates to numa nodes are in the possible set and if not fall back
to acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node() i.e. "if impossible fallback to
closest". That way this failing config will start working albeit with
the wrong numa node, but that's the firmware's problem. See the calls
to acpi_map_pxm_to_node() in drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c.