On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler(a)linux.intel.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:54:55PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Prevent these tests from bitrotting going forward by arranging for them
> to be run against nfit_test resources in the case that an ACPI.NFIT
> provider is not found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>
I'm testing on a system without nfit_test, but with a working block namespace
and PMEM namespace.
Prior to this change both the blk-ns and pmem-ns tests pass, but with this
patch they are both skipped.
I'm guessing that it's looking for nfit_test resources, not finding them, and
then just skipping the test instead of running against my real PMEM & BLK
namespaces?
Ah, yes, it bails if it can't load nfit_test.ko. Let me re-order that
a bit. Thanks Ross!