On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar(a)linux.ibm.com> wrote:
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> writes:
> Update numa_map_to_online_node() to stop falling back to numa node 0
> when the input is NUMA_NO_NODE. Also, skip the lookup if @node is
> online. This makes the routine compatible with other arch node mapping
> routines.
>
> Reported-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar(a)linux.ibm.com>
> Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/157401275716.43284.13185549705765009174.stgit@d...
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com>
> ---
> mm/mempolicy.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index 4cff069279f6..30d76db718bf 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ int numa_map_to_online_node(int node)
> {
> int min_node;
>
> - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> - node = 0;
> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE || node_online(node))
> + return node;
>
> min_node = node;
> if (!node_online(node)) {
The above if condition will always be true?
No, not for the node_offline case, and that's typically what callers
are passing.
>
> -aneesh