On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 09:14:29AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>Hi Wei Yang,
>On 04/26/18 at 09:18am, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 08:18:46AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >The struct resource uses singly linked list to link siblings. It's not
>> >easy to do reverse iteration on sibling list. So replace it with list_head.
>> Hi, Baoquan
>> Besides changing the data structure, I have another proposal to do the reverse
>> iteration. Which means it would not affect other users, if you just want a
>> reverse iteration.
>> BTW, I don't think Andrew suggest to use linked-list directly. What he
>> is a better solution to your first proposal in
>> Below is my proposal of resource reverse iteration without changing current
>I got your mail and read it, then interrupted by other thing and forgot
>I am fine with your code change. As I said before, I have tried to change
>code per reviewers' comment, then let reviewers decide which way is
>better. Please feel free to post formal patches and joining discussion
>about this issue.
Yep, while I don't have a real requirement to add the reverse version, so what
is the proper way to send a patch?
A patch reply to this thread is ok?
I am not sure either. Since my patches are still under reviewing. And
you have pasted your patch. It depends on maintainers, mainly Andrew and
other reviewers who have concerns.