On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 04:17:13PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 1:55 PM Kieran Bingham
Oh, yep, you are right. Does that mean we should bother at all with a defconfig?
If one wanted a qemu enabled type of kernel and also for kuniut one
could imply run:
That would get what you suggest above of default "bells and whistles"
and keep the kuniut as a fragment.
Hm, actually the kvmconfig doesn't really enable the required fragments
for qemu, so perhaps one would be good. It would have the serial stuff
Luis, I know you said you wanted one. I am thinking just stick with
the UML one? The downside there is we then get stuck having to
maintain the fragment and the defconfig. I right now (in the new
revision I am working on) have the Python kunit_tool copy the
defconfig if no kunitconfig is provided and a flag is set. It would be
pretty straightforward to make it merge in the fragment instead.
Up to you in the end.