On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 14:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 14:01 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:18 PM Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.c
> om> wrote:
> >
> > With v5.1-rc1 all the nvdimm sub-system regression tests started
> > failing because the libnvdimm module failed to load in the qemu-kvm
> > test environment. Critically that environment does not have a TPM.
> > Commit 240730437deb "KEYS: trusted: explicitly use tpm_chip
> > structure..." started to require a TPM to be present for the
> > trusted.ko module to load where there was no requirement for that
> > before.
> >
> > Rather than undo the "fail if no hardware" behavior James points
> > out that the module dependencies can be broken by looking up the
> > key-type by name. Remove the dependencies on the "key_type_trusted"
> > and "key_type_encrypted" symbol exports, and clean up other
> > boilerplate that supported those exports in different
> > configurations.
>
> Any feedback? Was hoping to get at least patch1 in the queue for
> v5.1-rc2 since this effectively disables the nvdimm driver on typical
> configurations. Jarkko, would you be willing to merge it since the
> regression came through your tree?
The reason I sent out the RFC was to see if the people who actually
wrote the code had any reasons they needed the current way of doing
things preserving.
No, it looks fine. The error return codes will change, but I don't
think that is a problem.
Mimi
I think your series looks fine except you need to export
key_type_lookup (patch 2) before you use it (patch 1) to preserve
bisectability of builds.
James