On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 10:24 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar(a)linux.ibm.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 09:20 -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
> On 11/27/18 12:20 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 2:13 PM Dave Jiang <dave.jiang(a)intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Adding nvdimm key format type to encrypted keys in order to limit the size
> >
> > s/Adding/Add an/
> >
> >> of the key to 32-bytes.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang(a)intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c | 29
++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> >> index d92cbf9687c3..182b4f136bdf 100644
> >> --- a/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> >> +++ b/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted.c
> >> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static const char hmac_alg[] = "hmac(sha256)";
> >> static const char blkcipher_alg[] = "cbc(aes)";
> >> static const char key_format_default[] = "default";
> >> static const char key_format_ecryptfs[] = "ecryptfs";
> >> +static const char key_format_nvdimm[] = "nvdimm";
> >> static unsigned int ivsize;
> >> static int blksize;
> >>
> >> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ static int blksize;
> >> #define HASH_SIZE SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE
> >> #define MAX_DATA_SIZE 4096
> >> #define MIN_DATA_SIZE 20
> >> +#define KEY_NVDIMM_PAYLOAD_LEN 32
> >>
> >> static struct crypto_shash *hash_tfm;
> >>
> >> @@ -62,12 +64,13 @@ enum {
> >> };
> >>
> >> enum {
> >> - Opt_error = -1, Opt_default, Opt_ecryptfs
> >> + Opt_error = -1, Opt_default, Opt_ecryptfs, Opt_nvdimm
> >> };
> >>
> >> static const match_table_t key_format_tokens = {
> >> {Opt_default, "default"},
> >> {Opt_ecryptfs, "ecryptfs"},
> >> + {Opt_nvdimm, "nvdimm"},
> >> {Opt_error, NULL}
> >> };
> >>
> >> @@ -195,6 +198,7 @@ static int datablob_parse(char *datablob, const char
**format,
> >> key_format = match_token(p, key_format_tokens, args);
> >> switch (key_format) {
> >> case Opt_ecryptfs:
> >> + case Opt_nvdimm:
> >> case Opt_default:
> >> *format = p;
> >> *master_desc = strsep(&datablob, " \t");
> >> @@ -625,15 +629,22 @@ static struct encrypted_key_payload
*encrypted_key_alloc(struct key *key,
> >> format_len = (!format) ? strlen(key_format_default) :
strlen(format);
> >> decrypted_datalen = dlen;
> >> payload_datalen = decrypted_datalen;
> >> - if (format && !strcmp(format, key_format_ecryptfs)) {
> >> - if (dlen != ECRYPTFS_MAX_KEY_BYTES) {
> >> - pr_err("encrypted_key: keylen for the ecryptfs
format "
> >> - "must be equal to %d bytes\n",
> >> - ECRYPTFS_MAX_KEY_BYTES);
> >> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >> + if (format) {
> >> + if (!strcmp(format, key_format_ecryptfs)) {
> >> + if (dlen != ECRYPTFS_MAX_KEY_BYTES) {
> >> + pr_err("encrypted_key: keylen for the
ecryptfs format must be equal to %d bytes\n",
> >> + ECRYPTFS_MAX_KEY_BYTES);
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >> + }
> >> + decrypted_datalen = ECRYPTFS_MAX_KEY_BYTES;
> >> + payload_datalen = sizeof(struct
ecryptfs_auth_tok);
> >> + } else if (!strcmp(format, key_format_nvdimm)) {
> >> + if (decrypted_datalen != KEY_NVDIMM_PAYLOAD_LEN) {
> >> + pr_err("encrypted_key: nvdimm key
payload incorrect length: %d\n",
> >> + decrypted_datalen);
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> >> + }
> >
> > I suspect this may not be the last key type that gets added, but I
> > wonder if we should instead create key-types based on the dlen size.
> > I.e. create a generic 32-byte key-type "enc32"? That way if another
> > 32-byte requirement key comes along we don't need to come touch this
> > routine again.
> >
>
> I'm ok with that if Mimi is.
If the usage (eg. format: ecryptfs, nvdimm) limits the dlen size(s),
how will defining generic key-types help? If there are no usage size
limitations, then there would be no usage specific definition.
I must be missing something.
...or I did a poor job of describing the problem. I'm just looking
ahead to another potential encrypted-key use case, but instead of
nvdimms this would be to lock / unlock persistent memory "namespace"
objects. If it turns out the namespace key is just another 32-byte
encrypted key should the encrypted-keys core grow support for a new
"namespace" key type, should it reuse the "nvdimm" key type, or
should
we define a generic 32-byte payload-size-requirement key type?