Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-15 13:30:22)
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:24 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd(a)kernel.org>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-07-12 01:17:28)
> > diff --git a/kunit/test.c b/kunit/test.c
> > index 571e4c65deb5c..f165c9d8e10b0 100644
> One solution would be to piggyback on all the existing devres allocation
> logic we already have and make each struct kunit a device that we pass
> into the devres functions. A far simpler solution would be to just
> copy/paste what devres does and use a spinlock and an allocation
> function that takes GFP flags.
Yeah, that's what I did originally, but I thought from the discussion
on patch 01 that you thought a spinlock was overkill for struct kunit.
I take it you only meant in that initial patch?
Correct. I was only talking about the success bit in there.