Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [PATCH 1/2] x86: add support for the non-standard protected e820 type

On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani(a)hp.com&gt; wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > OK, I will send a patch for the fix, with suggested update from > Christoph of not to re-add 'type' argument to e820_end_pfn(). > > Yinghai, I will add your sign-off to the patch. Let me know if you have > any concern. I think we should restore all to original. e820_end_pfn(unsigned long limit_pfn, unsigned type) e820_end_of_ram_pfn e820_end_of_low_ram_pfn otherwise it will cause confusing, because last two really have ram_pfn, and the first one does not has ram in the function name.